Marking Studio: give every decision the attention it deserves

Marking Studio · Shown with an example submission

MARKING STUDIO

Still marking across five windows?

A one-minute story of a calmer way to mark: the work, the criteria and your judgement in one place. It plays by itself. No sound.

Skip to the details
Original work in view Feedback in context Checks beside the evidence People own the decision
ROOM TO THINK

Everything you need.
One piece of work at a time.

From choosing the next submission to writing the final feedback, the studio keeps the detail close and the next step clear.

An inbox with a clear next step.

See what is available, assigned to you, in progress or waiting for review. Preparation, ownership and the next action stay visible, so your team can pick up the right work.

The original, always in context.

Review the submitted work alongside the question, criteria and evidence. Move through the assessment without losing sight of what the learner actually submitted.

Feedback where it makes sense.

Record marks or criterion outcomes, write feedback against the work and bring the overall response together. Saved drafts let you return to the decision you were making.

A useful starting point. Yours to review.

Where AI is enabled, inspect proposed marks, rationale and feedback against the available evidence. Accept, adjust or reject suggestions as part of your own review.

YOUR WAY OF WORKING

At home in the studio.
Or in your document.

Some markers prefer to work on screen. Others think best with a document in front of them. There is room for both.

  1. 01

    Choose your marking method

    Work in EduMark, or download a marking copy where the assessment allows it. Supported copies can carry AI suggestions with them.

  2. 02

    Bring the marked work back

    Upload your completed copy. Follow its progress and see anything that needs attention as the marking is recorded against the submission.

  3. 03

    Keep the review connected

    The work stays part of the same marking and moderation journey. Check the recorded result and returned file before release.

Document actions depend on assessment settings, permissions and file support. Review the output and any flagged content during Beta.

CONFIDENCE, WITH CONTEXT

The mark is only
part of the decision.

Understand the submission, involve the right people and keep a clear record of how the result was reached.

Integrity belongs beside the work.

Review available similarity and AI-content reports alongside the submission. Assignment rules determine whether a concern holds work, requests resubmission or flags it for review.

Explore EduMark Integrity

A clear route through review.

Use second marking, reconciliation and moderation when configured. Named reviewers and explicit release steps keep responsibility visible throughout the process.

Explore EduMark Journeys

History that stays with the attempt.

Keep recorded decisions, feedback and corrections in context. Review earlier attempts when work is resubmitted, without confusing an old result with the current submission.

Explore writing history & replay
AI suggests. Your people decide.

AI Beta can support marking; a named human confirms the decision. Integrity reports inform a review. They do not decide whether misconduct occurred.

A FEW PRACTICAL QUESTIONS

Before you
step inside.

Can we mark without AI?

Yes. Mark in EduMark using your own judgement, or use the document workflow where the assessment allows it. AI assistance is optional. Your assessment settings and permissions determine which actions are available.

Does AI make the final decision?

No. AI Beta offers proposed marks and feedback for a person to review. A named human confirms the marking, and the assessment’s moderation and release rules still apply. An integrity score is a signal for review, not a finding of misconduct.

Can markers work in a document?

Where enabled, download a marking copy, add marks and feedback, then upload the marked work. EduMark records the returned marking and shows its progress or anything that needs attention. Supported copies can include AI suggestions. Document support varies, so check the returned file and any flagged or unmapped content.

How does it fit with moderation and resubmissions?

Marking Studio keeps the submission attempt, recorded decisions and feedback together. Second marking, reconciliation and moderation are available when configured. Corrections and resubmissions follow the assessment’s rules, keeping earlier attempts and their decisions in context.

Can we try it with our own assessment?

Yes. Open a demo organisation to explore the workflow, or start free and add Plus to try AI marking on your own assessment, grading criteria and review process with your team.

LESS ADMIN. MORE ATTENTION.

Bring your next assessment.
See how marking could feel.

Explore the workflow in a demo, or try your own assessment with your team.

Show me Marking Studio Get started